It's not perfect but it's pretty darned OK and, unlike PowerTab, is still in active development.Change to the umber of strings you plan on tabbingĪfter changing to the number of strings next is the tuning. I could have fit the staves to the page better, added performance tips, removed the LilyPond credit at the bottom, etc., but didn't take the time. It's just the raw TuxGuitar->LilyPond->PDF cycle. It was for a student so I didn't take the time to optimize the page appearance. I made this using TuxGuitar and LilyPond. Here is a link to a PDF file of my tab of Elizabeth Cotten's tune Wilson Rag. LilyPond will produce publishable scores or entire publishable music books that look as nice as anything in a store. It also gives you the ability to add any features to your printed score that TuxGuitar doesn't directly support. This makes dealing with LilyPond source files and producing printed scores very easy and natural. There is a popular and powerful programmer's editor called jEdit that has a very good LilyPond plugin. It isn't really straightforward but it's very powerful and the scores look very nice. The appearance of LilyPond scores is highly configurable once the user figures out the paramaters to tweak. ![]() The goal of the LilyPond project is to produce scores as beautiful and readable as the hand engraved scores we used before the advent of computer printed music. LilyPond's printed output is arguably the most beautiful printed music available from a computer program. Lot's of LilyPond users have no programming experience. Setting up and using LilyPond will be a breeze for an IT guy. LilyPond is a command line system that converts a LilyPond (.ly) source file into PostScript and or PDF. As a longtime LilyPond user, I thought that solution was wonderful. Rather than spend their time and effort tweaking the output and competing directly with everything else out there, they wrote a plugin that exports the piece in LilyPond format. But the developers have provided a workaround. The score is complete, it's just not as nice looking as I would like to see. The developers know that their printed output is weak. I've donated money to their effort and will probably donate more in the future.īut I'm not really excited about the printed score that is generated by TuxGuitar. I've had them make improvements in the program based on my input in the forum. The developers also offer a discussion forum that they actually read and answer. ![]() It lets you build your own chord library for each tab so if you're using exotic chords you can specify them in detail and cause those diagrams to be included in the printed score. You can loop sections during playback, slow things down for practice, export MIDI files, change instruments, etc. TuxGuitar also loads and or imports the most common tab formats found on the Net (i.e., TablEdit, Guitar Pro, PowerTab) so the number of tabs you can access from TuxGuitar is huge. ![]() Better, in my opinion, than Finale ever was. The GUI is nice and note entry seems as quick and straightforward as we could expect. ![]() I also want the note durration independent between thumb and fingers. I like to have the stems for thumb notes pointing down and the treble or melody notes pointing up. It supports multiple voices per staff which I find really important for fingerstyle guitar tabs. No tab/score program is totally wonderful no matter how much you pay for it.īut TuxGuitar comes close in my opinion.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |